there are seeds but no trackers!! please help

In my opinion one of the most grotesque films ever made. It only really serves to remind us of how vile human beings can be when societal restraints are removed. Watch with caution.

PLS SEED!!!

Thanks alot bro!!

Thank you! I just hope I can watch it, it sounds kinda disturbing...

what were the other movies like this? i know irreversible is one, i forgot the others...

thank's for bringing us the more obscure movie's partner. I haven't seen this movie in a long time. I was thinking about buying a copy off of ebay for $50, but thankfully, i found your torrent first. also, Great quality

hey reingold
thanks & thanks once again

HA HA HA

thx! nice vintage quality.
seeding now, so leechers, come get it.

Rein! U r surely Gold!

Thx

Holy shit, all of my neigbors must be seeding this! I just saw this download top out at 670mbps, which is faster than I have ever seen a torrent get on my network.

thanks a lot!!o

Omg. This film is shite. They eat shit on this film:O

This is a f*** Good Movie ^^
i like it

oooh i forgot 10/10

How to I get subtitles on the film please? I have a file that isn't .srt it's just called "~utorrent partfile_2AD3C5F9". I've tried all the drag to player stuff to no avail...?

Wow I actually figured something out for myself for a change. Simply dl the .srt file from subtitle sites then drag onto the player wow so easy. Tho the file could have already been attached here to make life easier but oh well :-/

thanxalot good quality enjoy!

This is the most disturbing and grotesque film I have ever had the displeasure to watch. Marquis de Sade may be revered as a genius to some but I truly beg to differ and say instead that he should have befriended Freud. The fact that Pasolini did not even touch many of the aspects of Sade's original story reminds us of how twisted some human minds are.

hey awesome there Reingold
thanks for the english subs..

I've started downloading this torrent now. Thanks for this, been looking for it.

Ok, your welecome. This movie is a little gruesome xD.

has anyone commenting ever even read the book?

of course, the movie is somewhat troubling, but try the book.

i assure you, one of De Sade's best piece of work!

i'll comment on quality, post-visualization, seeing as most commentors can't seem to...

oh yeah, sorry...

thanks

{Reingold}!!!!

i've seen this before, but must have misplaced it.

Gazie!

original quality!

thanks!

lol internet

Really a stupid movie. Watched it out of curiosity. The writer is definitely a pervert and sadist. The story and idea it self could have been good but extreme homosexuality, pedophilia and violence just ruins it. Don't waste your time and bandwith.

the guy who made this had real personal issues. its so fucked up.

I'm not seeding this.
I am truly honest when I beg you not to either download or watch this. It's horrifying. And not by the means of horror or gore; but by gay pedophilia in about 45 minutes out of 1:50. The rest is stories of pedophilia told by a sicko.
Do not watch this.

DaNtsu

"It's horrifying. And not by the means of horror or gore; but by gay pedophilia in about 45 minutes out of 1:50. The rest is stories of pedophilia told by a sicko."

So the pedophilia doesnt bother you as long as its not gay pedophilia?

Disturbing? Oh, yes. Many, if not most people will just simply loath this film. If that's you, go away; don't watch. Some will like it for all the wrong reasons. What many fail to realize is that this is a political film It is about how people interact, or rather fail to interact with one another. It is a film about fascism and therefore highly relevant.

Oh, and my runtime on VLC list's it at 1:59:49

Ya, sujaidr, I agree fully. Cannibal Holocaust is the one movie that I don't want to watch again! That high pitched, eerie music in the beginning gives me nightmares! I actually like watching this one, Eraserhead, Man bites dog, Men behind the sun, Bad boy bubby, irreversible, among others over and over.....

The August underground movies are just silly though.....

This movie is about sick people acting out their fantasies on a bunch of kids. Download if you like that. Just don't masturbate to it!!!!!!!!!

If you're not familiar with the work of Marquis de Sade don't bother watching this, you probably don't understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquis_de_Sade

it's based on his book, The 120 days of Sodom

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_120_Days_of_Sodom

i haven't seen this but - I know this - the more people call it sick and horrifying and tell people not to watch it, the more people will download it. It's like putting up a hinged sign that says "do not lift this sign and see what's underneath".

@Everyone who says dont watch the movie -

Man the fuck up.

Alright, this movie, like Pasolini's Porcile, is about the New Left in Italy in the late 1960s. As in Germany, many in the conservative political establishment, the pillars of upstanding society - the older generation which supported the Pax Americana and the United States in its Cold War as well as its manifestation in Vietnam - were in power and thumbing their noses at the antiwar movement. They were sitting there pretending they had some monopoly on morality, as older generations in power are known to do. What Pasolini was trying to do with this film was to point out that fascists were monsters. He's was saying "look at your parent's generation, THEY ARE MONSTERS." That is the point of this movie. Get it yet? It's actually brilliant. It was his last film too, he was (possibly) murdered after it was released, and conspiracy theory holds that it was possibly politically motivated. At any rate, that's why this film is so heavy handed and goes so far out of its way to offend. It's genius. What a shame people don't get it now that it's been removed from its original political context. Does this clear things up?

In the 1970s, so many of the people in power in Italy had literally been fascists and had been involved with Mussolini's regime. The same was true in Germany, this is why the Red Brigades and the Red Army Fraction (New Left antiwar terrorist groups, like the Weather Underground in the United States or the Angry Brigade in Britain). See what he's doing here? It's not just sick shit for the sake of being sick. Like I said, he made another film called Porcile which is about the same topic, more or less, except he focuses on how the older generation's political crimes were forgotten and replaced and forgotten in exchange for a consumer culture and security guarantees by the United States during the Cold War. They're both great films because they call attention to the way that, after 1945, the fascists and imperialists, as in Japan, melted into polite society and kept their jobs because they were anti-communists and the United States wanted allies. It's really amazing to me how clueless people are about 20th century history and how horribly confused they seem to be about this shit. What a shame. Is there one person on here who actually understood what this movie was about? Sometimes I feel like we live in a new dark age.

So, this film is basically a middle finger to hypocrisy of fascists turned Cold Warriors. Pasolini is without a doubt one of the bravest and most talented filmmakers Italy ever produced. What a shame that it's over so many of your heads. No offense.

One last thing, the plot of the movie, again like Porcile, is about the old consuming the young, as the Americans were consuming their young by sending them off to die for capitalism in Vietnam. Ok, I'll stop. You get the point (I hope).

shitty movie

Now here is a film to watch with your girlfriend or on the first date. No seriously this one is literally crap, don't waste two hours of your life watching it, although I found the beginning of the dog scene somewhat funny. This version seems cut but I can't be sure because there are several edits, and some very violent scenes, shootings and especially the tortures at the end, but all in all not more shocking than Caligula, but you may find it hard to have dinner just after watching it. The director was murdered shortly after its premiere.

Thank you. :D

Just so all you silly folk know - there is quite a bit of history to this film:

this film is based on the book by Marquis de Sade which he wrote while imprisoned in the Bastille in 1785. Sade was incarcerated in prison and in an insane asylum for nearly half his life.

In Pasolini's film, four men of power in Italy: the Duke, the Bishop, the Magistrate and the President, collect a group of teenagers, and subject them to 120 days of torture. Graphically violent, the film was, and is still, banned in several countries for its depiction of sexual torture - particularly to children, as they are raped, mutilated and forced to eat faeces. Despite all of this - the film still excludes some of the horrors of the book - it's no wonder why the word Sadism was derived from Marquis de Sade's name.

Dark - yes. Culturally relevant? Yes.

If you don;t wanna watch stuff like this - maybe read about what your gonna view first.

Show some respect people, the man was murdered in the streets for making this film. Dying for your art is the ultimate privilege for an artist and the mark of TRUE ART. I read this book in high school and its a masterpiece written in blood and feces on toilet paper while the author was in a mental asylum. Two people died for this story to be told. SHOW RESPECT.

this movie is a total masterpiece! i'll be seeding it for the rest of my mortal trailer trash piece of shit life.

those who are saying do not watch, i want to ask a question why did you watch it anyway.........................................

This film is sold on the name de Sade, but does not deliver anything you would hope for or expect. By today's standards, it is in fact incredibly banal; nearly everything is implied rather than depicted. While de Sade had a interesting if not unique concept to begin with, perhaps the reason he never finished it was the moribund nature of a disorganized concept that happens when you haven't stopped to articulate a theme and drives one into writer's block to the point of being a dead end.

Such a story could've been rescued; the production here fails to do this. Not because you need explicit scenes to carry the impact, but because of the general overall poor production aspects. The dialogue is clumsy and unrealistic. The cinematography is sloppy and lazy and misses countless chances to evoke impact. The story struggles to advance and the tempo is miserably slow. This degrades the story-telling and the viewer is left with tortuously long minutes of wasted film between clumsily built plot-points.

Despite what one might be expecting, the movie is slow, the scenes tame, the depictions overly modest by contemporary standards and the general film-craft dull and perfunctory. The set-up, construction and introductions are completely hollow and may as well been derived from stock footage with voice-overs. The many levels of passion that could've been evoked with even tamer depictions is lost completely and the movie is left with a washed out tone. The actors are never given scenes to develop their character and the viewer thus never has any character to relate to and is left watching from a very impersonal, palpable distance, unengaged. The distance is so great you dont even feel like a spectator to the movie itself, but rather a spectator to the device you are watching it on.

The entire first third of the movie abandons the viewer to begin by watching paperwork being done in wide shots, wide-shots of people talking and walking, and finally transitions to closer shots of people talking, yet not close enough to transmit a mood, as they ramble disjointed lines with cuts and story-boarding that wouldn't even qualify for a tv commercial.

While there is some bland nudity interspersed, the sexual acts, which seem to involve little actual sex, are again shot with horribly impersonal angles and distances (compounded by film quality of the era), and are easily surpassed by soap opera make-out scenes for passion and engagement. I frankly found it bizarre that a presumed homage to the Marquis de Sade, a centuries old European icon of perversion, made by Italians could so quickly disabuse the notion of European films as risque.

The reported outrage over the 'torture' and age are grossly overstated and reflect the time of the film's release; modern slasher horror better acheive the shock ths film is rebuked for. De Sade's work did indeed describe children, but the actors & actresses playing their roles here could easily be served in any tavern.



In a word; cheap. In a second; imitation. Don't let the historical prestige or the neophyte gasps at depravity fool you; it is less than vanilla in depiction and duller than Sunday talk shows in execution. There are many modern b-movies that manage to capture more passion than this film. While Pasolini may enjoy some reputation as a film-maker, so did Van Sant; the point being the great movies that make directors famous are still humbly counted as the grand minority of their work, to put it cordially.

Like many banned movies of the past, modern re-evaluations have removed the ban with a laugh in all but the most repressed countries where a rating agency is even taken seriously at all. You can only really view this as unique if you are over 80, are a Pasolini fan or have never seen another morally transgressive film, which is impossible by age 14 in the modern era of cable television.

Nonetheless, thanks to the the uploader without whom I could not have had the chance to form any opinion at all. Any discussion emanates first from his efforts. Thank you.

Passolini was killed by his young gay lover. Many people says he was a great filmmaker, I'm going to watch this movie, eventhough I'm quite sure I won't like it...

Anyone who cries foul of this film, merely does it a favour. And Thank You to them.